Monday, August 21, 2017

A Consistent Critic

Sargon of Akkad has been a consistent critic of AntiFa for months now (at least). He has a regular show, This Week in Stupid, that re-caps the events of the past week. This week's video is an excellent critique of AntiFa and its relationship with the media. Even provides a good idea on how o handle the AltLeft.

While Sargon is a liberal, and we disagree on certain things, I'm in full agreement with him when it comes to AntiFa and the AltLeft. They need to be stopped, and we need to call them by their true names:  terrorists. If you can't stomach to call them terrorists, call them criminals. Both are equally true.

Edit: If you agree with Sargon and I, and think that AntiFa should be formally addressed as terrorists by the US government, then you may to sign this petition.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

Cultural Erasure

The destruction of the statue in Durham wasn't the beginning. No, the cultural erasure of the West and America in particular started much earlier than that; although I'm finding it a hard time to define when.

Many people have already written about what the destruction of this statue means.

I see it, and I think of Germany.

Germany is so vehemently ashamed of its past as Nazis, that they're willing to import immigrants by the millions and erase themselves. Despite all of the wonderful innovations and contributions Germany has brought to the world.

I think of Paul Joseph Watson's video about modern art.

These leftists, these criminals, these vandals, don't even possess the decency to respect the statue as a piece of art. Why tear it down? Why not let some collector buy it? Why not hide it away in the private vault of a museum? What would they erect in its place - some statue of an androgynous, beastly non-person screaming into the sky? Probably just trash they want us to believe is art.

It makes me think of the USA.

We're importing migrants by the buttload. How long before the descendants of our founders are replaced by immigrants? Are we like the Germans, so ashamed of past that we need to erase ourselves? To that I say: FUCK THAT SHIT!

Yes, the USA has a fucked up history, so fucking what? EVERY country, EVERY nation, EVERY tribe of man, EVERY culture has a fucked up history. We have to accept that our nation made those mistakes. We have to accept the terribleness of those decisions. But we can't accept those mistakes and begin to grow from those mistakes if we erase the history and cultural significance of those decisions.

Look at how we have grown! Look at how we've learned from those mistakes! We've ended slavery, we invented the car, we invented the airplane, we invented the internet, we put a man on the moon, we put a robot on Mars, and so much more!

USA is the greatest nation in the world. No one else has freedom like ours. No one else has contributed so much to the world. THIS IS SOMETHING TO BE PROUD OF! THIS IS SOMETHING WORTH PERPETUATING! WORTH PROTECTING!

I'm an American of the United States. This is my nation.

I won't be replaced! I won't be erased! I will not accept the Alt-Left's attempts to silence me!

I'm here to stay. I'm here to win.

Monday, August 14, 2017

The Left is Gonna Get Shot.

Today, Sargon of Akkad posted a video about how the YouTuber known as Baked Alaska may have suffered permanent eye damage from being peppered sprayed.
I've written about the violent left in my blog before, and shared several other peoples' opinion on their violence as well.
Consistently, the one thing that no one else seems to want to talk about is how these violent attacks could potentially justify the use of deadly force. Sadly, this yet again another example.
I don't know what the law would say about permanent eye damage - would it be considered serious bodily harm, or does it have to be blindness? I don't know. What I do know, between macing people and causing eye damage, bashing people's skulls causing concussions and memory loss, and beating a man unconscious, if the left haven't already justified the use of deadly force, they're getting closer and closer to crossing that line.
The day they cross that line,  is the day one of them is going to get shot, and on that day: we're all fucked.
If any knows /pol/ lets see if we can't expose more of these leftists so justice can be served.

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Google Army

Years ago, I don't remember, I once wrote a Facebook post where I stated that I would willing join the Google Army if mega-corporations ever became a thing, because at that time, I believed that Google actually respected peoples' individual, God-given, unalienable rights.

Boy was I wrong!

Let me apologize for pledging my allegiance to such an organization. Google has clearly pledged their allegiance to the false god of diversity. I will not pledge myself to the same false god. Fuck Google.

But, I'm using their products: Blogger, Gmail, Chrome, etc. Well, I don't pay for any of these products, so there is that, but yes, if a better platform presented itself, I will transition.

I've been one of the guys encouraging people that we need a new platform on YouTube. I'm ready to put my money where my mouth is.

Yes, I'm on (, and ( I recommend you get on there too.

The next phase is a replacement for YouTube and Patreon.

They can never silence you again once we break away and form our own platforms.

Monday, August 7, 2017


I recommend that you watch the whole thing, but if you're short on time, just watch the last 8 minutes.

by Rudyard Kipling

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy -- willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddently bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.


Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Connecting Dots

If you read my blog, you have may noticed that I like to post videos that I find are all linked together - either by theme or ideas explored. As I've stated, everything is connected. Today, I'm posting these videos and article in order, because I found particular similarities between "the beautiful ones," homosexuals, the lack of privacy and gay pride parades, the Last Man, Universe 25/Mouse Utopia and what is going on in Europe. I wanted to write more about these connections, but then I re-watched TL;DR's video and his ending, and realized he summarize quite nicely all of the other connections.

The last two videos, Black Pigeon Speak's video on CRISPR Gene Editing, and Jordan Peterson and Stefan Molyneux's video on Sorting Yourself Out, represent possible solutions or hope for society through individual choices and the advancements in technology.

Just remember, as TL;DR explained, we must be careful when drawing conclusions from the Universe 25/Mouse Utopia experiment and humanity.

Monday, July 31, 2017

My Review of Atomic Blonde.

It's boring. I wasn't nearly as bored by Atomic Blonde as I was by Batman V. Superman, but I still wished it ended far sooner than it did. I don't know if it was just Charlize Theron in this particular role, or her in general, but she had zero charisma in this film. If this film was meant to sell us on the idea that she would make a good, female James Bond, they failed.

All this movie had going for it were some neat visuals, a crazy, bonkers versions of 1989 Berlin, Germany, a softcore, lesbian sex scene, and James McAvoy. Unfortunately, you've seen this character done by McAvoy before in other films. You know what? I wonder if they hired McAvoy to add some much needed charisma to the film, too bad he wasn't enough.

So, unless you want to go watch a porn scene, in public, with Theron and Sofia Boutella, and get away with it by calling it art - skip it.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

Trump's Ban

Am I the only one excited about Trump's ban on trans serving in the military?


The military just avoided a logistic nightmare!

What logistic nightmare, you say? Well, let's get into that.

Boot camp would require 4 rooms per integrated (male, female, and trans) division of recruits. Why 4? Well, you can't really put a trans-woman (man into woman) into the female room. Most trans-women still have their penises. Boot camp actively discourages sexual relationships between recruits. The same is true for trans-men (women to men). Oddly, there are less statistic on the number of women who transition and keep their vaginas.

In boot camp, recruits are injected with numerous drugs - penicillin, tetanus shots, flu shots, and more. While most of these probably don't have any negative side-effects when interacting with estrogen and testosterone supplements, the military must still be prepared for possible medical complications - which will take time, resources, training, and money to research and put policy into place (we all know how wasteful the DOD is). There is also the long term consequences of men taking estrogen and of women taking testosterone.

This is also very expensive, and the taxpayers, through the military will be forced to pay for all of the trans' estrogen, testosterone, blockers, surgeries, and psychological care. The average cost of a US soldier is over $100,000 a year, with all of the additional care the trans will need, they'll cost even more.

Back to boot camp, when recruits are issued their uniforms on the first day/night, all of the men are gathered into one room, where they're forced to strip down, and put on their new uniforms. The same goes for women, but in separate room. For the trans, just like their living quarters, they will either need two new rooms for this process, or they'll have to wait until a room is available - adding time to the whole process. They then have to be segregated to trans-women, trans-men and ensure they get the necessary uniform items.

What physical fitness standards will they be held to? Trans-women will blow the low PT standards out of the water, while trans-men may struggle. We know this because trans-women are beating regular women in sports where they're allowed to compete against each other. The whole physical fitness standards must then be adjusted. Unfortunately, if lowered across the board, then we get fat, lazy soldiers who aren't fit to fight. Women and men are also measured differently for body fat percentage. Men have narrower hips than women, and this will be true for trans-women - if the trans are measured in accordance with their biological sex, then their "gender-preferences" aren't being respected.

Which brings us to the fact that trans-gendered people are delusional. Boot camp is an intentionally tough time, both mentally, and physically, and it's intended to weed out the weak. Compound the mental strain onto trans' delusions, and that's a recipe for failure - if not during boot camp, then after boot camp. Why set people up for failure?

I haven't even gotten out of boot camp, and I've demonstrated that this would have been a nightmare. The decisions that would've been made would have had far reaching consequences and long term costs. Considering that the active military makes less than 1 percent of the population, and trans make up about .3 percent - we were talking about catering to a fraction of a fraction of the population that were both trans and wanted to serve in the military. For what? The costs would've been ENORMOUS and I've yet to see any reports on how the military, and the people in general, would actually have benefited from paying this cost.

Oh, and for all the service members who want to fight back against Trump, fuck 'em. They're in direct violation of a lawful order, and Trump should dishonorably discharge anyone that doesn't follow his order, after they serve 2 years confinement.

Drain the swamp.

Tuesday, July 25, 2017

My Review of Valerian

Valerian is a good movie, and the hard work and passion put into making this film really shows. Interestingly, the two leads don't fit the archetypal physiques we are used to see. They're both short, Dane DeHaan isn't very muscular, and while handsome, he doesn't have the traditional good looks we ascribe to the ideal man. Cara Delevingne is thin, and beautiful in her own right, but not particularly busty, nor does she have a particularly great ass. Oddly enough, this works. I bring this up because it is so starkly contrasting from most movies. It does make it harder to believe Valerian is a lady-killer and has had so many sexual partners.

The plot itself is fairly straight-forward but with a good twist that I won't spoil here. As for acting, I don't know, it wasn't great, but it wasn't so bad that I  had to grit my teeth and bare it. It was serviceable, but it felt like there was a lot of missing emotional weight. This was particularly noticeable with Lauraline who always seemed to be emotionally distant, even though she clearly has feelings for Valerian. Their relationship works, but there is a scene where Valerian pours out his feelings, and that felt a bit off from the rest of the movie.

Technically, the movie is great. It greatly benefited from all of the advancements made after Avatar. The CGI was well done, and there were enough practical effects to make the world believable. The attention to detail was fantastic, and nothing felt wasted.

Lets dive into some of the themes of the movie. The de-emphasis on physicality is interesting. but in a far off distant future, that benefits from advanced technologies from numerous aliens, physically doesn't matter as much when it can be augmented with power suits. In fact, we learn this in the beginning of the film when Valerian discusses his memory score. Since the The World of a Thousand Planets, Alpha as it's called, was started as the International Space Station, this makes sense. Astronauts today have be both intelligent and physically fit, but again, in this film, physicality can be augmented. This makes the soldiers of the Human Federation more cerebral, than physical an interesting switch, but not as well demonstrated when we see Valerian demonstrate numerous physical feats without apparent augmentation.

Another interesting theme, is the idea of not only numerous habitable planets, with thousands of different aliens, but also multiple dimensions, with at least one that can only be accessed through a form of augmented reality. This augmented dimension is subverted, as the alternate dimension is used primarily as a tourist attraction and as the biggest, open-air market in the galaxy, all hosted on a largely barren, desert planet. It's a cool concept, and well thought out, but played for laughs and used as the set piece for the film's first big action scene.

There are many more themes, and ideas going on in this film, and while there isn't enough time in a film to explore all of them, enough ideas are explored to give us a real impression of a living, breathing, believable world. This what I love about good science fiction.

Unfortunately, there are clearly political and social justice messages, not so subtly on display. Again, going back to physicality thing, while an interesting idea about a more cerebral fighting force (or at leas Federal Agents), it also lends itself to the false idea that men and women are largely interchangeable. This is most apparent with The Pearls, an alien, humanoid race that are androgynous. Their females still have breasts, but the men and women both sound like females. It's weird. 

There is also a political statement about immigration with the scenes involving Bubble. I found this boringly typical, pro-immigration, left wing dogma. It doesn't even make sense. Alpha is an artificial world, created by numerous aliens, and inhabited by millions. Alpha allows for almost all kinds of cultures and almost any kind of behavior. Why then couldn't an alien sex worker (Bubble), not get citizenship? It's never explained, but it's there for the virtue-signaling.

Globalization and multiculturalism are also big themes in this movie. Again, Alpha started as Earth's International Space station. We see the USA getting along with the Russians, then with the Chinese, and then with all the rest of the world. As this progresses, so does the space station grow, until it's big enough to attract aliens. Despite the realities of how cultures tend to clash, all of the different races get along, and there aren't any big racial or cultural clashes on Alpha. The evil General has a somewhat "nationalistic" view, and is willing to trample over the Pearls whom he deems as "savages." Can you see where this going?

The above actually brings up valid criticism of war and the consequences of war and war crimes. This is a great subject to explore with science fiction, but it's not explored here very well beyond: war is bad, and all races and cultures are equally good/valid/have-something-to-offer - despite reality showing us that no, not all cultures are good. Some cultures are clearly better than others. We actually see this in the film as one group of aliens is willing to eat other intelligent races - and this is tolerated by Alpha's government.

What I do like about Valerian are all of the concepts on display. I really enjoy seeing creatively designed aliens, the imagination of the creators brought to life as they explore what could be. I like how Valerian and Lauraline's relationship is an old one, not new, and we're jumping into it after it's well established. I like all of the technology on display - especially the AR-alternate-dimension, and how people bring things into and out of it. I love the attention to detail.

Valerian is by no means a perfect movie, it is flawed, and the messages are obviously leftist. If you can set that aside, you may enjoy it. If you can't, don't watch it.

Monday, July 17, 2017

Y'All Need Jesus!

Have you seen this clip from Bad Boys II?

"Y'all need Jesus." This is something I like to say to myself when I see someone doing something crazy. What does Jesus represent? Well, lets see what Jesus said of Himself in John 14:6.

Jesus said, "I am the way, the truth and the life."

This is what that means to me:

The Way - the moral, ethical, virtuous, and righteous path. The way to live one's life.

The Truth - the truth. The opposite of lies. Honesty.

The Life - the opposite of death. Living.

So, when I say that someone needs Jesus, what am I saying? They need to be virtuous, ethical, moral; they need to hear the truth and not lies; they need to live, and to stop embracing death.

Let's look at the Left. As of late, they have been embracing more and more hedonism. Hedonism is self-gratification. Hedonism is short term pleasure over long term goals/gains. The Left lies. Just look at CNN, and SJWs. The left doesn't live. Sure, they exist in life, but look at their activism - it promotes death, destruction, and violence. They are extremely lucky that people haven't died because of their attacks.

They are clearly in need of Jesus. If they were virtuous, perhaps they wouldn't be so violent. If they could hear the truth, perhaps they would stop believing and spreading lies. If they had a life, perhaps they would see how their actions will cause death.

Those opposed to evil must follow Jesus. They must embrace virtue, and hate evil. They must be honest, and destroy lies. They must have a life, for when you are alive, you don't fear death.

Everything is connected.

Saturday, July 15, 2017

Don't Watch this Video!

People have recently noticed that a video is strangely missing from someone's list of video. Is YouTube censoring content? Even when signed in, and with the content filter off, it's not there in the list.

The Prodigal Son

The story of the Prodigal Son is a story I'm well familiar with, having grown up hearing this story.

Recently, I've been thinking about it. As the story goes, the son runs off to experience all the world has to offer him, but in the end none of the what world had to offer was as good as what his father had to offer - so he returns, and his return is celebrated by all expect his brother.

I don't know what other people focus on when they think about this story, but I've been focusing on lately, is the father, and what he didn't do.

The father didn't pursue his son, he didn't even say no to the son. He let the son go to make decisions for himself, and then he celebrated when the son chose to return to him.

This decision to choose the father over the world, is essentially a parable of how important it is for people to choose God. But, to look at it much more broadly, it's a parable of how important it is for people to choose goodness, righteousness, honesty, courage, and all of the other virtues.

It's also relevant for what is going on in today's world. The people of the world have chosen the world and all of its immediate gratifications: food, sex, entertainment, and many other types of pleasures. They have chosen the false virtues - what is known as virtue-signalling. They have chosen short term pleasure over long term goals. Now it's all coming to fruition - the famine of morality, culture, and virtues is here.

On a more personal level, my life has mirrored the son's life in many ways. I went out into the world, and saw much of it. I partook in all of the earthly, short-term pleasures: sex, food, entertainment. But all of that has been hollow, and I often look back and ask myself what would've been a better use of my time.

Now, I'm at a point in my life where I am at a transition. I want to be me. The best version of me. To be good. To do good. Shall I return to my Father's house?

Monday, July 10, 2017

CNN Succumbs To Meme Warfare - Vol. IV

This has been the best compilation I've seen so far! I laughed almost non-stop (I took a break to post a comment). Please share favorite #CNNMemewar memes, and/or compilations.

Let's see those rare Pepes!

Friday, July 7, 2017

Fix Marvel Comic's Star Wars

Of Marvel's Star Wars Comics, I've only read a few issues. I read the entirety of the Shattered Empire mini-series, and roughly the first volume of the main Star Wars series. I didn't like it. It didn't feel like Star Wars. So, I stopped reading it.

What I didn't like about Shattered Empire: Shattered Empire was a diversity checklist. The main character is a woman. She's also not white. She get's shoe horned into adventures with the main characters. The comic makes references to all of the places from the movies, in a very artificial way. In the end it was all about Force sensitive trees - stupid. They retconned the Rebel Commandos into a diverse fighting force full of men and women, despite what is seen in the movies. The main character settles down on Yavin 4 - why? Why did Palpatine want to destroy Naboo, his homeworld?

What I liked about Shattered Empire: It fleshed out a side character, like the old stories used to do. Palpatine had an evil plan in place for when he died. It added some details that didn't detract from what was shown in the movies.

What I didn't like about the Star Wars comics: Luke uses his lightsaber WAY too much. Luke encounters and fights Vader far too early, deflating their big fight in Empire Strikes Back.  The way the artist decided to illustrate the lightsaber motion - clunky. Those tentacled scavengers were just reworked Jawas. What was a Jawa doing imprisoned on that moon anyway? Some of the art makes Han Solo look like a Neanderthal or some sort of ape-man. Why is Boba Fett chasing Luke and not Han? Sana sucks. Han's hideout planet sucks if its electrical atmosphere can't keep out TIE fighters. The artwork for some of the aliens sucks.

What I liked about the Star Wars comics: Having the heroes work together to go get shit down, and continue the fight against the Empire - good. Sabotaging an Imperial arms factory and free slaves - good. Vader was good.

Here are my proposals to making the comics better:

First, adopt some guidelines:
  1. Never supersede the movies. If it wasn't in the movies, doesn't sound like it could've been in the movies, or doesn't look like it could've been in the movies - don't publish it. Essentially, no retconning without cause.
  2. Never supplant the main heroes. No one can be better than the main characters from the movies. This doesn't mean that characters can't grow to be as good as the main characters, but they can't exceed them. Essentially, no Mary-Sues.
  3. Understand the source material. Understand the time in which it was created. Understand where it was created. Understand how it was created. Understand the why. Watch the movies, repeatedly.
  4. Write to the time line. You have 3 years between A New Hope and Empire Strikes Back. You have 1 year between Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi. Always keep this mind. Keep your stories tight. Don't get bloated like Dark Horse and the original Marvel Star Wars comics.
Second, some specific suggestions for direct fixes:
  • Find better artists. Find artists that can draw the Star Wars characters without needing to trace still images from the movies
  • Hire better writers. Hire people who love Star Wars, who want to dig into all of its lore and mine it for ideas.
  • Tone down Luke's use of his lightsaber to almost nothing. Seriously. Luke doesn't learn how to really use his 'saber until Empire Strikes Back, after his training with Yoda. Show Luke practicing what Obi Wan showed him in ANH (they do actually do this), but show him failing at it (very slow progression). Show him accidentally cutting something realizing just how dangerous they are.
  • Stop feminizing Luke Skywalker. In many drawings of Luke, he looks like a woman. Gross. Stop that! This goes back to the better artists.
  • Stop drawing Han like a big dumb brute. Again, better artists.
  • Luke should never fight Vader directly. Never supersede what is in the movies. In fact, just keep Vader separate from the main characters as much possible. Make all of their encounters long distance.
  • Kill off Dr. Aphra. She's a terrible character. Also, destroy her droids. Her astromech has too many weapons in it to be taken seriously. Again, never supersede what is in the movies. Nothing else in the Star Wars movies had weapons like that droid does.
  • Get rid of Sana. Seriously. She's a strong independent woman. Why is she pursuing Han?
  • Tone down the diversity. Star Wars is inherently diverse - trillions of people in the canon universe, you don't have to force it. People's outward characteristics aren't their only qualities, nor should they be their dominant qualities - that's poor writing. Additionally, as your sales-numbers have shown: forced diversity doesn't work.
  • Let the men be men, and the women be women. See above. Stop trying to make all of the women so much better than the men. Men and women are different and each have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Embraces that. It's natural, it's reality.
  • Boba Fett should be hunting Han, not Luke. It would fit far better with the movies
Lastly, I also have some ideas for the story.

Anytime Darth Vader shows up, the situation should suddenly feel tense. I don't know how you'd portray this in comics, maybe by changing characters' speech patterns. Darth Vader just lost the Death Star. He's obviously angry, but isn't lashing out at people. Why? Instead he seems focused, intensely focused, almost calm. What does Vader know that his underlings don't know?

Now, take the above situation, lets expand that. Things in the Empire have gotten tense since the Death Star exploded. The wider galaxy didn't even know the space station existed - because the Empire keeps a strangle hold on the HoloNet. This is a great place to write about the obvious information war going on between the  Rebels and the Empire.

We know that the Rebellion had spies throughout the Empire, and that there were Imperial deserters. With the unease throughout the Empire growing, and the hunt for Rebels intensifying, how are the spies doing? They see Vader, the Emperor, and the Imperial High Command are all extremely calm. What do they know that know one else knows?

Rogue One, for all of its faults, showed us that there were different mentalities within the Rebellion. With the destruction of the Death Star, some of those mentalities obviously would've wanted to press their advantage. Why didn't they? By Empire we see the Rebels hiding on Hoth? Why? Who and what convinced them that hiding and building up their forces was a better idea then pressing the attack?

Luke is obviously friends with Dak Ralter by Empire. How did that friendship develop? In fact, why not spend more time on Luke developing as a fighter pilot. What other friendships did he develop with the other pilots and Rebels?

One thing Marvel did well, was Luke seeking a teacher. I never though about before. That's good, but keep his force and lightsaber training to minimum. Let him practice infrequently - he is after all a Rebel pilot now and his duties will call him away. When he practices the Force, don't make it like what we see in Empire. Maybe he's just lying on his cot, with a blast helmet on, trying to reach out with his senses. Maybe's he gotten away from his friends for a moment and just concentrating on something, trying to summon the same sensation he felt during his trench run. As for his lightsaber training - see above. Maybe he encounters a swordsman? Can the swordsman teach Luke when there are fundamental differences in their tools?

Develop the relationships between the main characters. Luke witnessed Vader kill Obi wan - how does he feel about it? Does it make him angry? Does he act on that anger? Does Luke and Han, talk to Leia about her torture by Darth Vader? How is she feeling about that? How do they feel about that? What are their thoughts? How is Leia feeling about the loss of Alderaan? Why is Han sticking around with the Rebels? What makes him decide to leave at Hoth? Develop Leia and Han's relationship. Take it slow. There are 3 years here.

Develop the supporting caste. How does Wedge Antilles become the leader of Rogue Squadron? How is Rogue Squadron formed? What is Mon Mothma up to? How are some of the other Rebel characters recruited or were they always there? If some of them were always there, how did they rise to power or to the spotlight?

Develop the Empire. Who are their elite teams? How are some of their members reacting? Just tell stories from their perspective.

In general, take what is seen in the movies, and work backwards. What happened in the time between the movies that got the characters to where they're at? Ask questions, and seek answers. Think things through and always ask if it makes sense - if it follows the rules of the Star Wars universe.

I love Star Wars, and I want to see its comics be the best it can be. It saddened me greatly how much political correctness, "diversity," and SJW bullshit infected its comics after the Force Awakens.

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Need Ideas for the Meme War, Summer 2017?

Since I can't make a gif to save my life, here are all of my ideas:

The Matrix: Trinity kicks the cops; Neo stops all of the agents' bullets; Neo bursts open Agent Smith and the other agents run away

Star Wars: Episode II: When the AT-TEs shoot down the trade federation ship during the battle of Geonosis; Mace Windu chops off Jango's head

Star Wars: Episode I: Darth Maul kills Qui-Gon Jin; when Anakin blows up the Trade Federation ship

The "You're a White Male!" meme replaced with "You're Fake News!"

Batman Dark Knight Rises: Bane breaks Batman's back

Scanners: The head exploding scene

That video clip of that white guy slapping all of the people at a BBQ (Slaps for Everyone)

Millions Way to Die in the West: The giant ice cube crushing death scene

Turbo Kid: When he blows up the villain

Spaceballs: Dark helmet playing with the dolls

Indian Jones: Raiders of the Lost Ark: The ark of the covenant is opened scene, and the Nazi's face melts

Platoon: Willem Dafoe's death scene

Star Trek (TOS): Kirk vs Gorn; Trouble with Tribbles; Kirk slapping himself

Star Trek The Movie: The Khan scene

Captain America: Civil War: When Captain America jump double-kicks Crossbones/his soldier off of the Humvee

Luke Cage: The hallway fight scene

Ong Bak 2: The Protector: The stairwell fight scene

Street Fighter: Ryu uppercuts Sagat; any of the post fight, "you lost" scenes

Hot Shots Part Duex: Any of it

Titan Maximum, Pilot Episode: When Lt. Gibbs shoots the reporter

The Punisher: The finale when the Punisher (Thomas Jane) sends Howard Saint (John Travolta) to his explosive death

Hobo with a Shotgun: Any seen where the hobo takes out the bad guys

That's it for today, folks! Hope you're inspired! Keep the shit-posting!

If you have any questions on how to use these, or what I was thinking, leave a comment. If you'd like me to re-tweet your memes, leave a comment below.

Monday, July 3, 2017

Baby Daddy

The Daily Mail posted an article today, in which they discussed the idea of transplanting wombs into men.

The first third of the article discusses whether or not taxpayers should pay for such surgeries. Ridiculous! The answer is of course: no. Taxpayers should not pay for the lifestyle choices of others - regardless if that choice has a negative or positive impact on society. Having a womb is not a human right. A womb is a birthright to women, and women only, just as a penis is a birthright to men, and men only. If a delusional male wants to have a womb surgically implanted in his body - fine, but he gets to spend his own money to do it, and no one else's. He must also accept any and all consequences for that decision. End of discussion.

The next third discusses how women have already received womb transplants and have successfully given birth. Fantastic! Amazing! It's always awe inspiring to see how far we've come with medical science and how much adversity humanity can overcome. Simply amazing.

But, this point is used to confound the issue. They point to these successes and ask the question: Why not men? Probably because men aren't genetically made to give birth to children! Men don't have a birth canal. Will men give birth through their urethra? Of course not! The only way for men "to give birth" to children would be through C-Section.

C-sections are performed by surgically cutting open the woman, temporarily removing her organs, and then surgically opening the womb to remove the child. Then everything has to be put back into place and sewn shut. This requires months of recovery time. As the primary providers in most relationships, how exactly will the men bring home the bacon? Not to mention all of the potential health risks, although, those are admittedly low.

What about the placenta? We know how it functions in women, but do we know how it function in men? Can we guarantee that it will function the same way? What about lactation? We know that men on estrogen can develop breasts, and these can lactate, but will their lactation be triggered in the same way as women are upon child birth? What complications will be presented by a pregnant man taking an excess of estrogen to make themselves "women"? What about the differences in male and female pelvic bones? Female pelvises are optimized for child bearing, men's aren't. What complications will that present?

I'm just some dude on the internet, but I seem to be more capable of asking more pertinent questions then these writers do!

The last bit pays a lip to the concerns people may have about all of this, but instead of answering any of those possible questions, or even writing one concrete question that needs to be asked, they move the discussion back to taxes. Cowards, and liars by omission.

Throughout this article, they mention a trans-man who is pregnant, pointing to "his" "success". They are so caught up with the idea of a "man" being pregnant that they completely omit the fact "he" must still be a woman, because "he" must obviously still have a functional uterus, vagina, breasts, and the supporting muscular and skeletal anatomy to have a child! Again, lies by omission.

I don't care what this person wants to call itself, but I'm going to call it a woman - because if it can get pregnant and give birth like a woman, it must be a woman.

These writers, these publishers, and these medical professionals are so caught up in this idea that they never stop to ask one very important question: Just because they can, does that mean they should?

Monday, June 19, 2017

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

The Violence of the Left is Spreading

Today, 4 people were shot in Alexandria, Virginia. One of the people shot was Republican Representative Steve Scalise. The suspect, is an alleged Bernie Sanders supporter, and part of a group called "Terminate the Republican Party," at least per his Facebook page (now removed).

Back in May, 2 people were stabbed to death in Portland, Oregon. The suspect, again, is a Bernie Sanders supporter.

Bernie Sanders is a Democratic Socialist. Democratic socialism is just socialism by any other name, and socialism falls under the same umbrella political ideology as collectivism. As history has shown, from Communist Russia, NAZI Germany, Communist China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, and even India - collectivism is an inherently violent ideology. Largely, this violence has come from communism, but as we're seeing here in the US, it can also come from socialism.

The violence of the left is no longer constrained to those who believe in collectivism and already had violent/criminal tendencies (AntiFa, and BAMN). It now appears to be spreading to individuals on the fringes of this belief, who are apparently self-radicalizing and turning to violence as their solution.

This is just like Islam. Like Islam, I fear that the left will grow more violent, as the media and politicians push more and more for impeachment. As the SJWs continue to hate everything. As progressives continue to push for ever more societal change.

It's time to take a stand, to fight back, to make the wicked retreat back to the sea. We can't love them, for they are not good. We must hate their actions, for their actions are evil. You can start fighting back whenever you hear the lies of progressive/socialist/communist values spoken by your friends and/or family. Don't let it go unchallenged. Speak truth to their lies. Speak truth to power.

Everything is connected, and our decisions have consequences.

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

Love, Hate, and Morality

An extremely interesting set of videos, and very relevant to current events, and to my last post. We cannot be morally consistent if we try to love what is both good and what is evil. We must love what is good, and hate what is evil.

Thus, we can't love murderers, rapists, thieves, liars, people who bear false witness, or those who incite violence in our communities.

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Practice What You Preach

Whenever Islamic terrorists attack, we often ask, "where are the 'moderate' Muslims who condemn these acts of violence?"

Maybe they don't know how.

Well, if we accept this argument, let me then show them how condemn of your own faith.

If you've followed the news, then you may have heard about some Christian Militias in Africa who've been killing Muslims. Yeah. Fuck these guys. They're not Christians. They're scum. They're criminals. I hope they get caught and are prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

To be a Christian means to follow Christ. To follow Christ, means you don't go running around killing people for their beliefs. Yes, I know that Christ drove the money changers from the temple (Matthew 21:12-13), and I understand that's an act of aggression and violence, however, in any translation of that passage, Jesus never killed them. Yes, I know that Christ told his disciples to buy swords (Luke 22:36), but when one of those swords was used, Jesus was quick to condemn his disciple (John 18:10) - and then healed the wounded man.

Do you know what else Jesus never did? He didn't drug children and turn them into soldiers, you sick fucks. Jesus didn't chase down and slaughter his enemies. He taught to love your neighbor as yourself, and to go the extra mile. Your murder of civilians, regardless of faith, is evil, and God will judge you for this - for murder is a sin.

Fuck these so called "Christians." Jesus may forgive them for their sins, but these murderers are still bound by the laws of man. I hope they get what they deserve.

For any "moderate" Muslim out there reading this, there you go, that's how you condemn someone.

Saturday, May 20, 2017

Last Man Standing Review

If you haven't heard, Last Man Standing, a TV show starring Tim Allen has been canceled. Many people have been saying that the cancellation was due to the show's and Allen's political stance. That may or may not be true, and that's not what I want to write about.

Have you ever heard of the Streisand effect? Well, I never watched Last Man Standing before today, this was for 2 reasons: I don't own a TV and cable subscription, and I wasn't that interested. Now that it's canceled, and on Netflix, I've decided to watch it.

I've only watched the first 3 episodes, but I've really enjoyed it. It's sweet. It's a classic family sit-com. I definitely recommend it.

The show is definitely conservative leaning. Whether or not this actually reflects the creators' and actors' values, or if it's just to appeal to a certain demographic, I'm not going to speculate. The show makes fun of SJWs, communists, socialist, and beta-males - at least so far in the first season and 3 episodes. This is all appealing to conservatives, and right-wingers, and if you consider yourself one, you may like Last Man Standing.

Personally, I think it could be better. One of the characters is a single mother who is working a full time job. She still lives with her parents, in their home, and I don't why she can't just stay home and take care of her son rather than send him to a SJW indoctrination pre-school. Thankfully, Tim Allen's character calls out the school's bullshit for it is, but by the end of the episode, the kid ends up back in that same pre-school. I get it, sometimes you have to compromise, but do you know what you don't compromise on? Your values. At least there is nothing great about the pre-school or its teacher, and he is displayed the pathetic tool that he is.

Thankfully, reality is illuminating the dangers of this SJW bullshit. Hopefully we learn this sooner rather than later.

Thursday, May 18, 2017

No Taxes, No Services?

Do you want to know why I consider myself more of a conservative? More of a small-government guy? This.

Penn & Teller had a similar episode on their Bullshit show.

Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Writing About What I Want to Write About

I share a lot of content that other people create. I do this because I like what they have to say, I enjoyed their content, and want to share it.

I haven't written much that I've actually wanted to write about. The reviews, and the few other things.

There is a lot of things I've want to write. I can't just simply write these things. I need to do the research behind the subjects first.

I'm not doing that research.

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

We Criticize What We Care About

I'm going to criticize the right for a bit.

My first criticism: Do not become the aggressors. During the last riots in Berkeley, CA, the one where the right and AntiFa actually clashed, recent footage has come out that some of those on the right actually started punching first. Do not become the aggressors. The whole reason you were winning this argument, was because you WEREN'T being the aggressor. The instant you become the aggressor and use violence, you have LOST the argument. By all means, defend yourself, but never, ever be the ones to start the violence.

My second criticism: What the heck happened with this budget bill? 1.1 TRILLION dollars for the next few months (at least), and it pays for all of the things you stand against? Republicans, you CONSTANTLY campaign yourselves as the party of the small, limited government, what is smaller and more limited than a government that can't function because it can't get paid? Oh, what, you scared all of those employees would lose their jobs and have to go find a job in the private sector? GOOD! AMERICA FIRST! Maybe, if there was this HUGE infusion of AMERICANS looking for a job you wouldn't have to import immigrants by the boatload.

My third criticism: Stop trying to REPLACE Obamacare, and focus on REPEALING Obamacare. Socialized medicine doesn't work. You don't even have to look further than the Phoenix VA to understand that. Repeal Obamacare, then get in there, figure out what's wrong with the healthcare system, and pass the most minimal laws you can to help it - better yet, repeal more laws to alleviate the regulations on system. Remember: SMALLER government.

Monday, May 1, 2017

Finding Happiness in Darkness

What makes me happy about the current violence? It's really shining a light on just how violent the left is. It shines a light on how biased the mainstream media is by their omission to condemn and call out the violence. How often do you hear these rioters (criminals) called such by the MSM? How often does the MSM call their violent acts what they are (vandalism, destruction of property, assault, assault with a deadly weapon, and attempted murder)?

I try not to despair. I want to rejoice, for these people have so graciously, openly displayed their true colors!

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

BAMN Are A Violent Cult

Sargon of Akkad discusses the violent, militant cult BAMN and its leaders. Remember, Jesse Arreguin, the mayor of Berkeley, CA, is a member of this organization and they mutually support each other.

If you watched the Jack Posobiec and Stefan Molyneux discussion, then you'll remember how Jack discussed that the Yellow Light communists are very likely the manipulators of the Red Light communists.

After watching Sargon's video, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to suspect that some those in BAMN (most likely their leaders) are also Yellow Light AntiFa and are manipulating Red Light AntiFa - as discussed in the previous video.Yvette Felarca is clearly willing to attack people (red light behavior), and the other leaders are capable of manipulation and brainwashing, as seen and discussed in this video.

Antifa Violence Exposed | Jack Posobiec and Stefan Molyneux

Jack Posobiec came to the same conclusion I did about AntiFa's dehumanization of their political opponents. However, what I didn't know was the origin of AntiFa, which originated in Italy under Mussolini and it was used to grow communist control. This reinforces my suspicions that AntiFa are purposefully agitating for violence in order to become martyrs, but for far more sinister reasons than I originally thought.

Monday, April 24, 2017

On the Berkeley Riots is once again breaking news and breaking hearts. Who's hearts? The left's.

Do you remember how the police stood down during the Berkeley riots? Did you ever wonder why? Well, has found out why.

I won't steal their work. I want to promote it. Go read it.

Monday, April 17, 2017

The Violent Left

There is so much I want to say about the violent left, but I don't know where to start.

Lets start with what scares me. AntiFa is a faction of anarcho-communists, who stand against fascism - or at least their definition of fascism. AntiFa is probably, currently, the most active and violent factions of the left in the US (at the very least they're getting the most attention). Their violence in it and of itself doesn't scare me, that just pisses me off. No, what scares is the mentality of the AntiFa, and the consequence of that mindset.

A few years ago I read a book, On Killing by Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman. In his book, Grossman describes how the military used two main tactics to increase the kill rate of their troops. These two tactics are to dehumanize the enemy and to create distance. We can see how AntiFa dehumanizes their opponents in the way they call them fascist or Nazis - the most hated group in history. They then promote, encourage and celebrate punching Nazis, creating a feedback loop. Just like the military that awards, encourages, and celebrates when their soldiers kill their enemies.
AntiFa celebrate punching Richard Spencer who they claim is a Nazi.

Humans have strong inhibitions against killing other humans, but not so much for non-humans.

The next tactic is creating distance. During the wars, the military noticed that the soldiers who had the easiest time killing were the ones furthest from the front lines - artillery men, bombers, and the navy to name a few. The reason for this, they hypothesized, was because of their distance between them and the consequences of their actions.

We can see this too in the behavior of AntiFa. They use mask, anonymity, and groups to create psychological distance (what Grossman called emotional distance), and then they use flag poles, bricks, M80s, bats, and pepper spray to create physical distance. All this helps remove them from the consequences of their actions.
Flags and bats, their preferred weapons.

These two tactics serve to lower people's inhibitions against killing humans, and you can see how easily it has served AntiFa to cause violence. Their violence has yet to kill anyone, but they have come close when they knocked a man unconscious and continued to beat him.

It gets worse. These anarcho-communists are SJWs, and what we know about SJWs is that they love to be the victims. How is this worse? Because as communists, they see themselves as revolutionists, and what is the ultimate victim: a martyr.

All of the recent behavior of these communists falls under what the law would call an imminent threat of serious bodily harm, and or death, which justifies the use of deadly force for self-defense.

I think this is their end goal. They want to die as martyrs in their "revolution" in order to swing favor away from the right and thus regain the power and control that they've lost. When the left turned to violence, they lost the argument, and violence is all they have left to regain what they lost.

They have nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Tuesday, April 11, 2017

We came, we saw, he died - now we suffer the consequences.

Do you remember how the Obama administration overthrew Muammar Gaddafi, the leader of Libya, back in 2011?

No? Let me remind you:

That was then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responding to questions about Libya and Gaddafi's death.

The death of Gaddafi and the toppling Libya's government has been directly linked to the migrant crisis.

As you're well aware, the migrant crisis has been causing numerous problems for the western world. There have been riots, fires, terrorism, and many other crimes. It's a huge societal and tax burden on the citizens.

Now, because of the migrant crisis, slavery is back. 152 years ago, the USA ended slavery, and now the US Government has brought back the African slave trade. All because the US government overthrew one government. Think about that.

Everything is connected, and our actions have consequences; unfortunately, it can take years for us to see.

Sunday, April 2, 2017

Why Modern Art is Absolute Crap

Paul Joseph Watson criticizes modern art and points out how it pushes a far left narrative. He compares this to Soviet Russia's Socialist Realism, a type of art that portrayed the Russian Dictators and Communism in glowing, vibrant colors.

I wanted to share this, because it's very similar to what Vice is doing in their current series A Smarter Gun - especially with their short fiction.

I highly doubt that Vice is telling its authors to write pro gun-control fiction, but what is more likely is that Vice is choosing their writers based on their proclivity of supporting gun-control. In this way, they're using art (storytelling) to push their disarmament ideology and further erode gun culture. This is very much like Socialist Realism, but instead of glorifying, it's trying to ruin.

It's amazing how this meme has spread and evolved for use in other niches, and it's important to point this out so you can see it for what it is and act accordingly.

Monday, March 27, 2017

A Review of Mandatory Carry

   has published several pro-gun-control articles as part of their recent Smarter Gun  series, a series that promises to explore smart guns or the lack there of. Today, I'd like to review their article: Mandatory Carry, by Caleb March (source:
            Mandatory Carry is a fictional (supposedly science fiction) story about a man named Paul, who lives in a fictional state of the USA, 5 minutes in the future. In this fictional state, every male is required, by law, to carry a gun. They are also required to intervene in criminal acts of violence; failure to do so is punishable by death.
            The story begins with Paul  walking the streets of neighborhood, when he comes across an old, wounded man. "[A] man came limping around the corner and leaned hard against the stop sign, clinging to it as his body crumpled to the sidewalk. Paul took a half step backwards and froze. The man looked old, perhaps in his eighties, and even at this distance, Paul could see that the left side of his torso and his legs were soaked with black blood."
            What does Paul do? By law he is required to help this man, if the man was a victim of a violent crime. Does he help this man? Does he  communicate with the old man, try to figure out what happened? Does he call for an ambulance? No.
            "[Paul] looked at his own hand and he was shocked to find his gun aimed steadily at the bleeding man. He didn't remember drawing the weapon but he understood in an instant why he had done it... Paul closed his eyes slowly, until tears welled up along his nose. The recoil of the gun shook his body and he fell backwards into the ringing silence, smiling as he drifted up into the ethereal shadows cast by the dancing leaves. "
            Paul kills the old man, and this is where we learn that there is something wrong  with Paul. I hate to use mental illness as an excuse for people's actions, and I won't use it here, but the author is clearly intending to paint Paul as mentally unstable. Regardless, as a free, independent adult, Paul made the decision to murder an old, wounded man - for no apparent, justifiable reason.
            The story then flashes back to Paul's life, and we learn more about Paul and this fictional society where every man must carry a gun. Here we learn that Paul hates himself for fearing his weapon, and is relieved when he is home and can disarm (he clearly never read TTAG).  We also learn that Paul fears becoming a social outcast if his fears are found out, for apparently, a new fraternity has formed around guns.
            There is much to be unpacked in the next paragraphs, and honestly, I haven't the stomach nor the mental endurance to dissect all of it, and discuss in great detail all of the possible meanings. A college level thesis could be written dissecting this article. Let me then discuss what I consider more interesting parts.
            Gun parties: "At these parties, the men would sit around a table and lay out their weapons under the chandelier light, watching the fragmented glare play across the polished shafts and curves, accentuating the erotic details. The room would grow quiet as the proud owners surveyed the landscape of phallic glory set out before them." Ah yes, the old Freudian Slip, where everything must be sexualized. Why? to make cis-gender males shy away from guns, thus destroying gun culture. It also harkens to penis envy and dick waving contests, this is an attempt of the author's to portray gun owners as childish and closet homosexuals. This also sets up a "No True Scottsman" fallacy - as no, true masculine man would think that need a gun, or associate with something so feminine. There is also an element of occultism, a sort of silent praise and worship, as if gun owners all believe in the religion of the gun.
            This of course sickens the main character, "a steady nausea danced through [Paul's] body while he spoke [with the other men about guns], and occasionally he felt his face begin to flush, and he would excuse himself to the bathroom. In the mirror, he would watch the blood drain from his face and beads of cold sweat bloom along his hairline." Just look at how disgusting guns, and guns culture is! Why it's so disgusting, it makes our apparently mentally unstable, feminine "protagonist" physically ill! Another reason to hate guns.
            Next, we are told a side story about how drifter raped a woman and shot a would-be-good-Samaritan. The Samaritan's gun jammed, and the drifter shot him. They were both hung by a noose. The sole purpose of this side story is to illustrate just how perverse the gun culture is, and how it has perverted the law and society. This is of course an affront to old adage: "An armed society is a polite society." It also flies in the face of the research that proves a strong correlation between well armed societies and lowered crime.
            Finally, we learn of Paul's fate. He is to be hung, and justifiably so. The old man was a well-connected,  influential, and productive member of society. This is clearly meant to recall thoughts of recent shootings, and how the mainstream media questioned their justification. However, unlike (or perhaps like) reality, Paul's case is pretty clear cut: he murdered that man. Paul dies, a symbol failure.
            As I stated, there is much to be written about this article, and I encourage you to read it and ponder the author's intent and message. This story is failure. The author trots out the same old arguments: people are crazy and can't be trusted; guns are all about compensating for a small penis; guns are phallic symbols and gun owners are secretly gay; real men don't need guns; guns are scary; gun culture is disgusting and cult like; and lastly, guns would make a "sane" man want to kill himself by cop.
            The truth, is no, men aren't carrying or buying guns to compensate for small penises. If that were true, how would they explain women who own guns? 
            No, the vast majority of gun owners are sane, law abiding citizens, who don't want to harm anyone unless their life is threatened. 
            If guns are phallic symbols, so is everything else, and when everything is a phallic symbol, nothing is. Some an object is really just the object it is. 
            Yes, some gun owners may be in the closet, and yes, there are even gun owners who are gay. However, a person's sexuality is a private matter, and really shouldn't matter. 
            Yes, guns can be scary, just everything new and unfamiliar; unfortunately, the author isn't helping, nor does he even try to analyze the protagonist's fears. 
            As the famous quote goes: "argue not the need." Once you get beyond food, water, and shelter, much of Maslow's hierarchy of needs is based on wants and desires. Get beyond the question of need, and starting asking why someone would want a gun. The answers are to defend themselves, hunt, master a skill, to collect, as physical investments, and/or just because they're cool. The great thing about a gun is that it do all of this at once.
             Gun culture isn't disgusting, or cult like. Again, most gun owners are law abiding. If you don't believe me, go to your local gun range and start asking questions. See how many people offer their advice.
             No, guns don't make you suicidal. Suicidal people are suicidal before they buy guns. As the author portrayed Paul, there was already something wrong with him, and he so desperately wanted escape that he committed a heinous crime to exit the world.
            The author fails one more time. As stated in the beginning, this story is part of article about smart guns, yet it never once mentions smart guns. It doesn't discuss how a smart gun could've stopped this murder (it couldn't). It doesn't discuss even potential pros, like stopping a child from shooting him/herself. The author does nothing in this story but try to destroy gun owners and gun culture. He paints us as childish, closet homosexuals, patriarchal, cultish, and crazy. He paints gun culture as disgusting. He seeks to emasculate gun owners by making his protagonist feminine. All of this is highly odd, considering it's posted on Vice's Motherboard page, which is supposedly about science and technology, and this is supposedly part of a series on smart guns. Then again, considering the disarmament crowd, it all makes sense to them.

            In end, my take away is this: the right to keep and bear arms isn't just about laws, but also about culture, ideas, speech, and the stories we tell ourselves and each other. To keep our freedoms, we're going to have to be prepared to fight a culture war of ideas and narratives.

Friday, March 24, 2017

Left-Wing Death Camps | Mike Cernovich and Stefan Molyneux

If you don't have the time, just listen to the first 20 minutes.

Death toll of leftist ideologies: 126.6 million, and counting.


Why do I say "and counting?" Because of Venezuela, and because these numbers are out of date. Consider that the numbers from North Korea is only up to 1987, but we know for a fact that Kim Jon-Un has killed many of his advisers and they still practice the incarceration of families into work camps. Venezuela is run by a socialist president and government. Its people are starving, and it's only going to get worse.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Michael Savage: High Risk Pool Will Save American Healthcare

Iron Fist, Episode 3

2 and half episodes into Marvel and Netflix's new series Iron Fist and I see that Marvel's and Netflix's social-political views have invaded their shows.

Half way through the 3rd episode, the show transitions to a scene in Colleen's dojo where her students are being taught by one of the senior students. Danny enters through the door, stepping around the students, and quietly observing. One of the students decides to start cracking jokes, rather than practice and take his lessons seriously. This appears to be very disrespectful to Danny who then takes a boken, and strikes the floor, getting everyone's attention. Colleen appears from the other room. Danny proceeds to lightly berate the students for their poor form and lack of discipline, he then proceeds into a demonstration. As he turns to begin his demonstration, he sees Colleen who makes no effort to stop him.

The student who was making fun earlier decides to disrespect Danny at the end of his demonstration by making a farting noise. Danny gracefully sweeps the student's legs, and the student falls to ground. Colleen rushes over to consoles the disrespectful student.

The next scene, Danny and Colleen are in the other room. It's here that we get some social justice. Colleen asks Danny what the hell, and who put him in charge (she did, by the way, by not intervening). Danny confronts her and asks if this is a day-care or if she's training warriors. Colleen then states that she's trying to provide a safe place for people, and that half the people in her dojo get beaten up by their families or bullies, and this is the one place where they don't have to worry about that - until now (because Danny is apparently a bully, or at least acted like one).

Notice that she didn't answer Danny's question. She can't. If she did, she'd have to confront the truth. The truth is, martial arts isn't just some shit you do to get into shape, or to feel good about yourself. Martial arts is intended to defend yourself. It's intended to teach you how to beat up other people should you ever find yourself in a fight and without a weapon or convenient escape route. In other words, it's a skill for warriors.

If her students are being bullied, then they're there to learn how to defend themselves against said bullies (yes, even their family). It's a well known fact that one of the best ways to stop a bully is defend yourself against them (that is if they act violent against you first). Once a bully learns you aren't going to be a victim, they usually stop. If her students don't have the wherewithal to take her training seriously, they're likely going to continue to get their asses handed to them.

So what is she doing, running an adult daycare, or a dojo? Well, at this point, and from my perspective, she's running an adult daycare.

Was Danny being a bully? I don't think so. Was it harsh of him to sweep the student's legs? Yes. The internet defines bullying as the use of force, threat, or coercion, to abuse, intimidate, or aggressively dominate others. Did he use force? Yes. Was he trying to abuse, intimidate, or dominate the student? No, he was emphasizing his point with action, sadly the only way that student seemed to want to learn.

Where's the social justice in that? Well, it comes when Colleen admits her dojo is a just a safe space. A dojo shouldn't be a safe space, it should be a place that will challenge its students physically, mentally, and potentially even emotionally. Does this mean it can't be warm and welcoming? No. Does it mean the students can't be friendly and can't crack jokes? No. What it means is that there is a time and place for everything, and during practice is not a place for jokes.

Later in the episode we get to see Colleen beat a man twice her size and probably twice her weight in a no-holds-barred cage fight. This fight scene is pure feminist propaganda. A real fight like that would've been extremely lopsided as the man's superior strength and reach would've overcome her skill.

It's a good thing Iron Fist is fiction, but it's too bad people will see this, spreading SJW and Feminist lies.

UNDERCOVER: Anti-Free Speech Panel Crashed by Crowder

UNDERCOVER: SJW Fat-Pride Feminist Panel Crashed By Crowder!

An Epiphany

I was watching Louder with Crowder's video, Undercover: SJW Fat-Pride Feminist Panel Crashed By Crowder (03/18/2017),  this morning. When I heard one of the speakers state that obesity starts much earlier, I paused the video, and thought to myself: "What does she think of the fact that prisoners get more yard time than children at schools get recess time; what does she think about growing up in a two parent household is the greatest indicator for success?"

It was then that I had an epiphany.



Feminism, SJW, Minimum Wage, the Expanding State, Welfare, Warfare, IQ, Success, Failure, Being Well Adjusted, the Family, Values, Culture, Ethics, and Everything is ALL CONNECTED!

We can't possibly see the incredibly tangled web, it's too much, and omnipresent, but it's there connecting every decision we make as a society.

This is why values are so important, why reason and evidence matter so much, why freedom is so great. Without a strong center, there is nothing to hold on to, nothing to trace back to, and nothing to center around.

Monday, March 13, 2017

Logan Review

Logan is a horror movie. Ok, not a true horror film, but it isn't a true action flick or drama either. It has all of these elements, and it's a rather refreshing take on the X-Men franchise thus far.

Viewed as a horror film, it has more in common with the old monster flicks and body horror films than modern slashers, supernatural horrors, or psychological horrors.

Who are the monsters? Well, everyone is a monster. The Reavers, Logan, Xavier, and yes, even X-23. Aside from a handful of characters, expect everyone to be monstrous in their own way. I won't go into detail about these characters, but if you look for it, you should see it.

The music during the fight scenes, in particular two, isn't the triumphant, victorious music of a summer blockbuster, but more dark, and desperate. The first scene, towards the middle, especially played into the horror genre and was reminiscent of slasher flicks.

What else can I say? I want to discuss so much more, but I don't want to spoil it.

Regardless, I recommend it.

Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Start a Blog They Said.

Welcome to my blog.

Why are you here?

Why am I here? I'm here to write a blog. What is this blog going to be about? Whatever I want.

Ok, that's a good introduction. Later!